Water Quality Dynamics of Pit Lakes
Figure 1 - Water Budget for a Typical Pit LakeOpen pit mining has increased substantially throughout the western United States over the past 20 years. During active mining, groundwater seepage, rainfall, and surface runoff are continuously removed from the pit. When mining and dewatering stop, water from these sources may accumulate in the inactive pit resulting in a "pit lake". This process is illustrated in Figure 1. If the pit wall rock or bottom sediment contains oxidizable minerals, particularly sulfide minerals, the pit lake may turn acidic and contain elevated concentrations of metals and sulfate. The pit lake may then pose an environmental hazard to wildlife and adversely affect groundwater quality. Whether or not a pit lake develops unacceptable water quality depends on the nature of the wall rock, the hydrodynamics of the lake, and its hydrogeologic setting. Sulfide oxidation is the primary process responsible for acidification and other water-quality problems in pit lakes. Understanding the physical and chemical processes controlling the oxygen budget of the lake is the key to predicting and controlling future water quality in the lake. A typical oxygen budget for a pit lake is shown in Figure 2. The three primary oxygen sources to the lake are:
      • re-aeration from the atmosphere,
      • photosynthetic oxygen production, and
      • transport of dissolved oxygen in groundwater seepage (Thomann and Mueller, 1987).

 

Figure 2 - Typical Oxygen Mass Balance for Typical Pit Lake For most pit lakes, re-aeration will be the primary source of oxygen, although the other two sources may be important under special circumstances. The availability of dissolved oxygen in contact with oxidizable minerals is required for acidification to occur. Because these minerals are generally located in the wall rocks and bottom sediment, whereas oxygen enters the lake from primarily the surface, acidification is strongly controlled by hydrodynamic mixing in the lake. Water circulation within a deep pit lake is largely controlled by the vertical profile of water density. Stable stratification results when the densest water is at the bottom of the lake. Unstable conditions occur when dense water occurs above less dense water. The lake water density depends on water temperature and dissolved solids content. In most pit lakes, water temperature controls the density of the water. Water temperature depends on climate, radiative heating, and the temperature of groundwater seeping into the lake. Climate is usually the most important control on the thermal regime of the lake. A typical heat budget for a pit lake is given in Figure 3.

Figure 3 - Heat Budget for a Typical Pit Lake Lakes in areas with small annual temperature fluctuations will develop little temperature stratification. Oxygen and chemical transport in these lakes are largely controlled by wind-induced eddy currents, groundwater circulation, and molecular diffusion resulting in oxygen mass transfer to the lake bottom throughout the year. Thus, the entire wall rock, bottom sediment, organic matter, and any other life forms will have access to dissolved oxygen year round. The presence of oxygen-consuming reactions with minerals and organic matter at the lake bottom will produce an oxygen distribution which monotonically decreases with depth throughout the year.

Deep lakes in colder climates develop strong thermal stratification, and transport of oxygen to deeper portions of the lake is dominated by the seasonal stability of the stratification. When the thermal stratification is stable, relatively little oxygen transport occurs between the epilimnion and hypolimnion (see Figure 2). When the stratification becomes unstable (density of the epilimnion is greater than that of the hypolimnion), the lake may turn over carrying oxygenated, shallow water to the bottom and deep, mineralized water to the surface. In climates where the surface water temperature remains above 4o C (39o F), a lake may turn over once a year in the winter. In colder climates, where the surface water cools below 4o C, lakes may turn over in both the fall and spring.


Most of the larger existing pit lakes contain water that does not meet drinking water standards, agricultural water quality standards, or aquatic life standards. Given the recent mining activity in the West, numerous pit lakes may be expected to form over the next 20 to 50 years. Because most pit lakes have yet to form, mathematical models represent the only way to estimate their ultimate environmental impact. The ability to predict the hydraulic structure of pit lakes may lead to development of operation strategies for controlling their chemistry. Hydro Geo Chem has initiated a research program to better understand the water quality and dynamics of this new type of human-made water body. Results of this research will be used to assess and mitigate the potential environmental effects of pit lakes.
Reference: Thomann, R.V. and J.A. Mueller. 1987. Principles of surface water quality modeling and control. Harper Collins, New York, NY.

- Return to Top Of Document -

Efficiency of Air Sparging Trenches

Figure A - Conceptual Sparging Barrier System
This article is a continuation of a series of articles in the HGC Gradient on air sparging processes. Air sparging is a groundwater remediation process that removes volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from groundwater by injecting air into water-saturated sediments.

Two approaches to air-sparging are common. The first involves injecting air through wells into the contaminated portion of the aquifer, thus directly attacking the contaminant plume. The second approach creates a barrier to VOC transport by sparging downstream from the contaminated zone (see Pankow and others, 1993).

In the sparging barrier approach, a sparging zone is created using vertical wells, horizontal wells, or trenches to inject air at a location where the contaminated groundwater will move through the sparging zone (Figure A). To the extent that the design is successful, VOCs are removed from the groundwater as it passes through the sparging zone and the water is aerated to enhance biodegradation of less volatile compounds.

Figure B - Cross-section of an Air Sparging Trench As illustrated in Figure B, trench sparging is conceptually quite simple, but is limited to relatively shallow depths. In principle, a trench sparging system should be highly effective and simple to operate because contaminated groundwater is physically and hydraulically constrained to move through the sparging zone.

Hydro Geo Chem, Inc. recently completed a detailed pilot study of the performance of a trench sparging system at a site in Arizona that was contaminated with gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons. The test was designed, in part, to determine the efficiency of the sparging trench in removing benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) at various air injection rates.

The results of the test are summarized in Figure C which shows the concentrations of the target compounds measured in the trench with time, as the air injection rate was increased. The continuous lines in Figure C represent the concentrations of each compound predicted by a mathematical model of the sparging process.

The model accounts for the dimensions of the sparging trench, the air injection rate, the groundwater flow rate, the gas-water partitioning coefficient (Henry’s Law coefficient) of the compounds, and the dynamic sparging efficiency. The dynamic sparging efficiency represents the effect of deviations from complete chemical equilibrium between the contaminated water and the sparge air on the sparging rate. The model is used to calculate the dynamic sparging efficiency at each air injection rate by adjusting the efficiency factor to match the observed concentrations.

Figure C - Dynamic Partitioning Factor Calculated from Transient Groundwater Concentrations As indicated by the insert table in Figure C, the estimated efficiency factor for BTEX compounds decreased from 50% at the lowest air injection rate to 5% at the highest. The fact that the concentration of each compound could be matched using a consistent efficiency factor at a given injection rate indicates that the sparging efficiency was affected by physical rather than chemical factors. The decrease in sparging efficiency with increasing air injection rates is probably the result of channelized air flow reducing the air/water contact area and contact time. Even at the lowest efficiencies, 99% reductions in concentrations were achieved for BTEX. Similar reductions were obtained for gasoline-range total petroleum hydrocarbons.

Reference:

Pankow, J.F., R.L. Johnson, and J.A. Cherry. 1993. Air sparging in gate well in cutoff walls and trenches for control of plumes of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Ground Water. vol. 31, no.4, pp. 654-663.
Gary R. Walter, Ph.D., R.G.

Jinshan Tang, M.S.


- Return to Top Of Document -


RCRA Update in the Pipeline

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) will be getting a long-awaited facelift. The corrective action process has been behind current management practices and out of sync with other EPA programs for about 10 years now. The EPA has finally published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rule Making (ANPRM) in the May 1, 1997 Federal Register which would restructure RCRA’s Subpart S. The objectives of the proposed revisions are to make remediation standards more consistent with other EPA programs, streamline the process to achieve faster closure instead of focusing on regulatory reviews and paperwork, make remedial goals more practicable and realistic, and reduce costs.

The Notice for Proposed Rule Making (as opposed to the advance notice) for the Subpart S revisions was originally scheduled for mid-1997, but has been delayed until December 1997. At that time, only some of the revisions will be officially proposed, while others will be re-crafted. The final rulemaking is anticipated in December 1998. So, these rules aren’t a quick fix, but the start of a long process that should result in more efficient and cost-effective RCRA corrective actions.

Alternate Regulatory Acronyms:

CATNIP: Cheapest Available Technology Not Involving Prosecution
CERCLA: Comprehensive Employment for Regulators, Consultants, and Lawyers Act
DFI: Designee for Incarceration
FINES: Fundamental Impact of Non-Compliance with Environmental Standards
FLAMES: Flammables Lacking Appropriate Management Effort
JAIL: Judgement for Actively Ignoring Liabilities
MFR: More Frustrating Regulations
NEPA: Needless Evaluation to Prevent Action
Doyne Wrealli, B.A.

- Return to Top Of Document -


HGC Professional Named BTI "A-Team" Performer

Every year, BTI Consulting Group, Inc. interviews organizations that use environmental services about individuals and organizations that are most effective. This year, BTI conducted 630 open-ended, unprompted interviews of these customers, who, altogether, nominated 104 service providers in the US.



- Return to Top Of Document -

 
HYDRO GEO CHEM, INC.
51 West Wetmore Road, Suite 101, Tucson, Arizona 85705-1678

Toll Free (800) 727-5547, Tel. (520) 293-1500, Fax (520) 293-1550, Email contact@hgcinc.com

3038 East Cactus Road, Suite 3, Phoenix, Arizona 85032-7113
Tel.
(480) 421-1501, Fax (480) 425-8794
 
Hydro Geo Chem, Inc. assumes no responsibility for the consequences of reliance by others on the
information provided on this web site
Copyright © 2017 - by Hydro Geo Chem, Inc., all rights reserved

 

 

 

 

Projects
Municipal Landfills

Tailings Seepage
CERCLA Feasibility Study
Desulfurization Ponds
City of Industry, CA
Earthen Cover Design
Hydroelectric Pump-Back
Trona Mine Dewatering

NPL Site Remediation
UST Petroleum Release
TMDL Analysis
Regional Aquifer Cleanup
In-Situ Remediation
Acid Mine Drainage
Groundwater Flow Simulation
Waste Water Handling

Water Resources Assessment
Water Rights Development
Water Supply Assessment

Clients
Philosophy/Approach
Key Staff
Movies, Charts, & Presentations
Technical Papers
Newsletter
Links

Employment